Home / News / Presidential Election Appeal: APC, PDP Clash Over Selection Of Supreme Court Justices

Presidential Election Appeal: APC, PDP Clash Over Selection Of Supreme Court Justices

The All Progressives Congress (APC), on Friday, attacked the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), over allegation that it is seeking to influence the selection of Supreme Court justices, that will decide the election petition between President Muhammadu Buhari and Atiku Abubakar.

The PDP caucus in the House of Representatives had on Thursday, alleged that the APC was planning to make the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Mohammed Tanko, sideline the most senior justices of the Supreme Court in the expected election petition panel.

The PDP caucus claimed that since 1979, seniority had been the main criteria in determining membership of presidential election appeal panels at the apex court.

Read Also:Tinubu Possesses Qualities To Become Nigeria’s Next President, Say Babachir Lawal

The main opposition party said the ruling APC is pressuring Tanko to abandon the convention.

However, the APC in its reaction, described the PDP’s claim as irresponsible.

Lanre Isa-Onilu, APC National publicity secretary, said the claim by the PDP House of Representatives caucus was unfounded.

Onilu said the alarm raised by the main opposition party had since vindicated its stance that the PDP was irresponsible.

Read Also: Achuba Faults Impeachment as Kogi Deputy Gov, Panel Denies Indicting Him

He said: ”We do not want to be drawn into engaging PDP in their usual shenanigans. We have just raised an alarm that our democracy lacks responsible opposition. We thought by now the main concern of every lawmaker would be to focus on the national budget.

“We want to be engaged on the issues of governance. That is what touches on the interests of ordinary Nigerians. That’s the focus of APC administration,” he told Saturday Tribune.

In a statement jointly signed by the caucus leader, Kingsley Chinda, deputy caucus leader, Chukwuma Onyema, caucus whip, Umar Barde and deputy caucus whip, Muraina Ajibola, the caucus declared that throughout the 16 years of PDP’s rule, it never at any time dictated the selection of panel members to the Chief Justices.

Read Also:Denying Igbo Presidency In 2023 Will Threaten Nigeria’s Coexistence – Vatsa 

The caucus insisted that selection of justices to hear the pending appeal filed by the PDP Presidential Candidate, Atiku must be in the order of seniority, in line with the tradition of the Apex Court in the interest of justice.

“We wish to state that selection of justices to hear the appeal of our great party’s presidential candidate, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar must be in accordance with the conventional practice of admitting only of the selection of the first-seven most senior justices of the Supreme Court: CJN Ibrahim Tanko, Justice Rhodes-Vivour, Justice Mary Odili, Justice Sylvester  Ngwuta,Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, Justice Musa Muhammad and Justice Kumai Akaahs,” the caucus said.

“The practice of selecting justices to hear the appeal is expected to precede the hearing, going by age-long convention. What isn’t conventional is the present attempt to influence Chief Justice Ibrahim Tanko, going by reports in the media, to subvert the age-long and time-tested practice, precedent and convention of selecting the most senior justices of the Supreme Court to hear the presidential election appeal.

Read Also: I Had Four Children For Neighbour, Not My Husband – Woman Tells In-laws

“ Chief justices of Nigeria through time have never in the selection of the Supreme Court’s election petition appeal panel surrendered to the phoney dictates of the ruling parties. We are proud to state here that never in our great party’s time in power, did it or its personages, dictate selection of panel members to chief justices- never.

“Selecting the Supreme Court panel isn’t about witch-pricking- picking justices who suck blood out of justice- isn’t about going outside the order of seniority to select justices, witch-prickers, without independent jurisprudential thoughts and whose singular attribute for selection is that they demonstrate permanent dislike for justice and passion for doing the bidding of power.”

It further submitted that, “selection shorn off pressure and influence of government and the present ruling party, is about demonstrating and holding firm to the constitutional powers of the Supreme Court to conduct its own affairs and not succumb to pervasive power and corrosive external influences.

“To sidestep precedents and convention is to provide legitimacy to the ruling party whose stock-in-trade is ridiculing the judiciary. Chief Justice Tanko must stick to precedents and conventions to preserve the integrity of the courts as the last hope of the common man and of the citizens of our great country.”

The caucus noted that in 2008, when Buhari was defeated by late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, he appealed the decision of the presidential election petition tribunal, and that then CJN, Legbo Kutigi, constituted Justices Katsina-Alu, Aloma Muktar, Dahiru Musdaphar, Walter Onnoghen and Niki Tobi as panel to hear the appeal that year

“He was never dictated to, nor was any attempt made by our great party to influence CJN, Justice Legbo Kutigi, who stuck to a conventional practice that consistently secured the seal of approval of past chief justices: CJN Fatai Williams, 1079, CJN George Sowewimo, 1983, and CJN Muhammad Uwais, 2003,” they stated.


About Oluwafemi Ashaolu

Check Also

EFCC Arraigns Man for N9m Fraud in Aba

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Enugu Zonal Office on Monday, July 13, 2020, …

P&ID: Daughter Of Former Petroleum Ministry Director Collected $9,969 Bribe – FG

Mark Howard, lawyer of the Federal Government in the case against Process and Industrial Developments …

One comment

  1. Pingback: Newsbreak.ng

Leave a Reply

WhatsApp Newsbreak